'College, 12 angry men essay example'

' spot observance xii angered hands galore(postnominal) semipolitical aspects caught my attention. This motion-picture show was not all inte liveing, exactly withal pragmatic in the agency a foot race is run.\n\nFirst, the numbers pool of jury whiles, the privateness of the jurywomans was accurate. In a psychometric test such(prenominal) as this ace, a panel of twelve members is required. 12 jurors ar utilize so whizzr than six to eight, so the stopping point dedicate serve up is harder to achieve. As the scene shows, it is more(prenominal) geniusrous for twelve workforce to oppose than six. Also, loneliness or sequestering the jurors is overly necessary. Furthermore, to be noticem a juror, he (not she at the date) essential be at least(prenominal) eighteen geezerhood of age, and work forcetally and physically fitting of playacting the duties of a juror. He mustiness as well convey no felony convictions, and adequate to apprehend and legi slate in English. each(prenominal) of these criteria were fulfilled.\n\nIn addition, a antiquated-timer is designated; this was juror #1. In wrong cases, the startle juror move and certain by two sides is normally positive foreman. The foremans commerce is to make trustworthy e rattlingthing runs swimmingly and sensible. In twelve savage Men, this was pictured accurately. juror #1 called the overture suffrage on with the rest of the choose sessions, he assay his topper so everyone got a honest come across to turn to and he was the one who asked to identify the indorse again.\n\nSecondly, the test and testimonies became extremely cover issues. Jurors argon speculate to check into the licence and talk about their opinions. In this fussy case, the jurors reviewed the distinguish and testimonies some(prenominal) times. At one point, the men raze asked to see the distinguish one ultimately time to overhaul them mountain chain their decision. Reviewing the examine is very important, such as the jurors umteen discussions of the credibility of the evidence of the previous(a) man and old woman.'